🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he “didn’t fear any repercussions” for portraying the Russian leader in a cinematic adaptation. The movie, however, could coincide so closely with the mythologized image promoted by Russian state media that, within Russia, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Manufactured Superhero

For years, the Russian political apparatus and the country's pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This figure is a political superhero without age or mistakes, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who always knows more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the manufactured Putin has long eclipsed the actual person.”

Screen-Based Support

A notable instance is a TV series released last October, directed by a pro-government filmmaker. The protagonist is a fictional security officer inexplicably chosen to “save” Russia from disorder. Although he is called Mikhail, the message is clear: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

International depictions frequently result in reinforcing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. A new film based on a popular book aims to subvert the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a symptom, moving the narrative weight to the political machinery around him.

The Fable of the Hesitant President

In the film, Putin is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to stabilise the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, none of this took place.

The Reality of the Casting Call

No one ever begged him to take the job. The position was effectively a casting call with many contenders. Central to this process stood an influential oligarch from the previous administration who expected to run the state de facto.

• The shortlist featured various figures, among them a reformer subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• Per an expert who researched Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: obedient, from the intelligence world, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the process said the key criterion was manageability and faithfulness, not strength.

“The goal wasn't a powerful leader, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a master operative was built after the fact. Stories about his clandestine activities in Dresden fall apart under examination. Fundamentally, he was an administrator and routine duties, a mid-level functionary not engaged in actual agent work.

Curiously, the shift to depicting him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by the actor's arrival as James Bond. The grittier interpretation prompted Russian media and social media to draw visual parallels with their leader. Mashup posters replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on city centers, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a local secret agent.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by Russian audiences, the authorities will not miss the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of mass protests, the political rivals, or key figures from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a welcome aspect for state propaganda.

Domestically, the president is often an omnipotent figure who never appears on screen. His influence is hinted at through portraits or calls “from above”. Now, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that could unintentionally echo the exact legends it perhaps aims to question.