🔗 Share this article

Throughout financial booms, there arrive points where market commentators question if exuberance has grown unreasonable.

Latest multibillion-dollar agreements involving OpenAI and semiconductor makers Nvidia and AMD have sparked questions regarding the sustainability behind massive investments toward artificial intelligence systems.

Why these Nvidia & AMD Deals Worrying for Financial Watchers?

Several commentators voice concern regarding the reciprocal nature in these deals. Under the conditions of NVIDIA's agreement, OpenAI will pay the chipmaker with cash to acquire processors, and the company commits to invest in OpenAI for minority stakes.

Leading UK technology investor James Anderson stated concern about parallels with supplier funding, where a business provides monetary assistance to clients purchasing their goods – a risky situation if those buyers hold excessively positive revenue projections.

Supplier funding was among the characteristics of the turn-of-the-millennium dotcom craze.

"It is not quite similar to the practices numerous telecommunications providers were up to in 1999-2000, but there are some similarities to it. I don't think it makes me feeling completely comfortable from that perspective of view," commented Anderson.

Meanwhile, the Advanced Micro Devices arrangement also entangles OpenAI alongside a second chip maker in addition to NVIDIA. Through the deal, OpenAI will use hundreds of thousands of AMD chips within their datacentres – the core infrastructure of AI tools including ChatGPT – while will have the option to buy 10% in AMD.

Everything here is fueled by the insatiable demand of OpenAI as well as competitors for as much computing power available to drive their models toward ever greater performance advancements – as well as to satisfy growing user needs.

Neil Wilson, British market analyst with financial firm Saxo, stated that deals such as those between Nvidia & OpenAI collectively pointed to circumstances which "appears, feels and talks similar to a bubble."

Which Are Additional Signs Pointing to Market Exuberance?

Anderson highlighted soaring market values at leading AI firms to be a further cause of concern. OpenAI currently worth $500 billion (£372 billion), compared with $157bn in October last year, while Anthropic almost tripled its valuation recently, rising from $60bn in March up to $170 billion the previous month.

Anderson commented how the scale of the value increases "concerned him." According to accounts, OpenAI reportedly posted sales amounting to $4.3bn during the first half of this year, alongside operational losses totaling $7.8 billion, as reported by tech publication The Information.

Recent share price swings have also alarmed seasoned market watchers. As an example, AMD briefly gained $80bn to its market cap throughout equity activity this past Monday following the OpenAI announcement, while Oracle – a beneficiary due to need for AI support systems like datacentres – added about $250 billion in a single day in September after reporting stronger than anticipated results.

There is also an enormous investment spending boom, which refers to spending on non-staff costs such as buildings as well as hardware. The big four AI "large-scale operators" – Facebook parent Meta, Google owner Alphabet, Microsoft and Amazon – are projected to spend $325 billion in capital expenditures in the current year, roughly the GDP of Portugal.

Does AI Adoption Warranting Market Excitement?

Faith in artificial intelligence expansion was rattled in August after MIT published a study indicating that 95% of companies receive no benefit from their investments in generative AI. The study said the issue was not the capabilities of the models but how they were used.

The report indicated this was an obvious manifestation of a "AI adoption gap", where new ventures headed by 19- or 20-year-olds noting significant increases in revenues through deploying AI technologies.

These findings occurred alongside a heavy decline in AI support stocks such as Nvidia and Oracle. It came 60 days after McKinsey & Company, the consulting firm, reported that eight out of 10 companies state they utilize generative AI, however an identical proportion indicate no significant impact on their profitability.

McKinsey said this is since AI systems are being used for general applications like producing conference summaries and not specific purposes such as highlighting risky vendors or producing concepts.

Everything here unnerves investors because a key commitment by AI companies such as Google, OpenAI & Microsoft remains how when you buy their tools, they will enhance productivity – a measure for economic performance – through enabling a single employee accomplish much more profitable output during an average working day.

Nevertheless, we see additional obvious signs pointing to a widespread embrace of AI. This week, OpenAI stated how ChatGPT currently used by 800 million people a week, up from the number of 500 million cited by OpenAI in March. Sam Altman, OpenAI’s CEO, strongly maintains that interest in paid-for access to AI is going to continue to "sharply increase."

What the Overall Situation Reveal?

Adrian Cox, a thematic strategist at Deutsche Bank's research division, states the current situation feels like "we are at a crossroads when signals are flashing different colours."

Warning signs, he says, are enormous capital expenditure where "the current generation of processors could be obsolete prior to spending pays off" and rapidly increasing market caps of private companies like OpenAI.

Cautionary indicators are over double in share prices of the "top seven" US technology stocks. This is offset by their price to earnings ratios – a measure determining if a stock stands under- or overvalued – that remain below past averages